This week on the Touro Law Review podcast we are joined by John Belcaster, the General Counsel of MSCHF, a Brooklyn-based art collective. MSCHF (pronounced “mischief”) produces artworks that critique and comment on American culture. The podcast discussion with Belcaster focuses on Jack Daniels Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, a trademark case currently pending before the Supreme Court.  As he explains, MSCHF filed an amicus brief (available here: MSCHF SUPREME COURT AMICUS BRIEF.indd.) in the Supreme Court that, among other things, asked the Justices and their law clerks to draw pictures – and thereby create art. The purpose of the brief, according to Belcaster, is to illuminate the issues raised by Jack Daniels Properties and to persuade the Court to take a broad view of what constitutes protected artistic expression.   

Brought to you by the Touro Law Review.   

Our guest today is John Belcaster.

Continue reading →

This week on the Touro Law Review podcast we are joined by Lisa Gochman to talk about her experience arguing the landmark criminal sentencing case, Charles C. Apprendi Jr. v. New Jersey, before the highest court in this country — the United States Supreme Court.  This week’s Touro Law Review Podcast episode is centered around Lisa’s compelling memoir, At the Altar of the Appellate Gods: Arguing before the US Supreme Court, which captures the terror, wonder, and joy of appearing before the nine justices in Washington, D.C.. Lisa defended the constitutionality of New Jersey’s Hate Crime Statute, which authorized the sentencing judge, rather than the jury, to consider the criminal defendant’s racial animosity toward his victims as a sentencing enhancer. This discussion follows Lisa’s fascinating experience as the case moved through the New Jersey State court system and up to the United States Supreme Court where Lisa faced a very hot bench.

Brought to you by the Touro Law Review.   

Our guest today is Lisa Gochman.

Continue reading →